Compare And Contrast Plato With Machiavelli On The Relationship Between The Ethics Of The Soul And The Ethics Of Politics Using `the Prince` And `the Trial And Death Of Socrates`

Politics is the art of ruling for the benefit of the people . It implies source and power needs to find al mavenification and arguments to support it This is wherefore in that location has continuously been a connexion between governance and the principles of good philosophy , no look if the latter ones support the occasion or if they stood in contradiction with it . This concentrates on the kinship between the ethics of soul and that of politics in the works of Machiavelli , The Prince and Plato s The exertion and death of Socrates . The similarities and the differences between the conceptions of the two authors atomic number 18 revealed with an skill psychology of the concept of virtue and its connection to the several(prenominal) s comfort and the surface being of the submit in the works that were mentio ned aboveBoth Plato and Machiavelli be concerned with the s dear being of the cite and the affinity between the demesne and the someone . The conception regarding the status of the individual is nevertheless distinct in their works . While Plato tries to come out that it is always break to be equitable than unjust , claiming that there is a ironlike connection between justice , in the flesh(predicate) happiness and the well being of the state , Machiavelli underlines the f lay out that moral principles are non necessarily connected with the efficiency of the act of ruling . If the principles of piety and justice need to be con nominateed in for the state to be prosperous , than this is how things must be done . The lowest spirit becomes an excuse for the means that are required in the process .

This is in fact the dilemma that is to be shew in The Prince : how is one supposed to care justice and morality when a just and moral purpose is to be served through immoral and unjust meansOn the other die , Plato establishes a connection between the state and the soul of the individual , considering justice as a virtue that is to be found in some(prenominal) these dimensions . The dilemma that occurs in The trail and death of Socrates is proving that it is always , disregarding of the circumstances , better to act in a just manner . The decision of Socrates to obey the jurisprudence , point if that meant last , is a strong illustration of the conception regarding the view for the righteousness and what is just . Both Plato and Machiavelli consider that the individuals need the state as a form of organization that is indispensable for their excerption and well beingAccording to Plato , the city (the state ) includes the individuals . Thus a just city automatically means happy individuals . Every citizen , no matter his status must respect the law . deprivation against the law means doing wrong to the city and thus to its citizens . Socrates believes that the roughly worthful possession of an individual is not a secular one , but his own soul Wealth does not stick about excellence , but excellence makes wealth and everything else good for men , both individually and collectively (Plato , 33...If you indigence to vanquish a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay